Mike Hancock CBE - Liberal Democrat MP for Portsmouth South

1A Albert Road
Southsea
Hampshire
PO5 2SE

Tel: 023 9286 1055
Email: email@mikehancock.co.uka>

 Working for You - Always Putting Portsmouth First

In this section

Mike Hancock News

MP calls for end to secrecy after record-breaking increase in animal experiments

21 July 2009

Mike Hancock has called for an end to secrecy over animal experiments after it was revealed that there had been a record-breaking increase in their number.

Mike Hancock recently tabled a Parliamentary Motion called for an end to secrecy over animal experiments. Details about experiments are not subject to Freedom of Information as other Government information is. Section 24 of the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 prevents the Home Office from disclosing any information, however trivial, about animal experiments that researchers want kept secret. Now the MP is saying this must end.

Government released today show a year on year increase of 454,000 to nearly 3.7m experiments. There was also increase in the number of experiments on primates such as macaques and marmosets by 14%. There were also 45 cases where scientists had infringed the licences to do research on animals.

Mike Hancock, a campaigner for animal rights in Parliament said: "There is obviously some information as in other areas that should be kept confidential. But I don't see why the public should not be able to put in requests under Freedom of Information as in other areas of Government work. I just can't understand why 3.7 million experiments are needed. It is a vast number. And we only have the scantiest knowledge of what is happening in these experiments. We need a more illuminating light shone on this area. Making it subject to FOI requests would be a start. The revelation of the massive number of experiments last year show that Government protestations that it is trying to reduce the number of animal experiments are bunkum."

Notes: Mike's EDM on Freedom of Information and Animal Experimentation can be found here - http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=39837&SESSION=903

Share this page:

Submit to delicious Submit to digg Submit to facebook Submit to reddit Submit to stumbleupon Tweet this post

Search News

Mike Hancock News Archive

Latest Annual Reports

Each year I publish an Annual Report which is available to any constituent who wants one:

Annual Report 2008 »
Portsmouth Talk 2008 »

Get Adobe Reader

Liberal Democrat News

01 February 2012
The ASA ruled that the image used in an advertisement for L’Oréal Paris’ Revitalift Repair 10 was altered to change Rachel Weisz’s complexion, making it appear smoother and more even. It was judged to be in breach of industry code and “misleadingly exaggerated” the performance of the product.

The advertisement has been banned in its current form and the ASA has warned L’Oréal not to use digital retouching to misrepresent the effect of their products.

Commenting, Jo Swinson said:
“The beauty and advertising industries need to stop ripping off consumers with dishonest images. 

“The banning of this advert, along with the previous ASA rulings banning heavily retouched ads featuring Twiggy, Julia Roberts and Christy Turlington, should act as a wake-up call. Thankfully the advertising regulator has again acknowledged the fraudulent nature of excessive retouching.
 
“The Royal College of Psychiatrists has spoken out about the harmful influence of the media on body image and has highlighted the airbrushing and digital enhancement used to portray physical perfection as an area of concern.
 
“There needs to be much more diversity in advertising – different skin colours, body shapes, sizes and ages.  Studies show that people want to see more authenticity from brands.  Images can be aspirational without being faked.

“The Campaign for Body Confidence challenges the narrow ideal of beauty perpetuated by the media and other industries. Tonight the All Party Parliamentary Group on Body Image is hosting a screening of the documentary Miss Representation which explores the impact on society of such an intense focus on women’s appearance, instead of their achievements. 

“The film shows how media misrepresentation and under representation of women results in a leadership gap and the silencing of difference.”