Mike Hancock CBE - Liberal Democrat MP for Portsmouth South

1A Albert Road
Southsea
Hampshire
PO5 2SE

Tel: 023 9286 1055
Email: email@mikehancock.co.uka>

 Working for You - Always Putting Portsmouth First

In this section

Mike Hancock News

MP demands that government takes oppor-tuna-ty to protect fish

25 February 2010

Mike Hancock supporting the campaign for the use of sustainable food in school, hospital and other public sector catering

Mike Hancock MP for Portsmouth South joined campaigners this week to demand that the government does not spend taxpayers' money on fish that is endangered.

Currently, schools, hospitals and care homes, for example, can buy fish such as cod, haddock and wild salmon that experts warn now have seriously low stocks, or have been caught by destructive fishing methods. Campaigners joined with Mike Hancock MP to call on the government to support new legislation, introduced in Parliament this week, to guarantee that only sustainable fish will be used in public institutions from now on.

A majority of the estimated £40 million of taxpayers' money spent on seafood in public institutions each year is likely to have been spent on species and stocks classified as 'fish to avoid' by conservation experts, or caught in a way that damages marine life. New research, by the Good Food for Our Money campaign, shows that only one out of 341 seafood options available to hospitals via the NHS's biggest catering supplier was certified as sustainable.

Mike was pictured with a giant fish at Westminster to promote this new legislation that would ensure all seafood purchased by public organisations is sustainable. A new law would stop our money being spent on seafood classified as 'fish to avoid' by the Marine Conservation Society, and make sure all wild-caught fish meets Marine Stewardship Council standards.

Mike Hancock MP said: "New rules to make sure that all public organisations - including schools, hospitals and car homes - only buy seafood that is safe from over-exploitation would help safeguard the future of some our most loved fish species, and would provide the British taxpayer with some much needed peace of mind about the fish that their money is buying."

Alex Jackson, Co-ordinator of the Good Food for Our Money campaign, said: "Having no sustainability rules for an issue as important as fish is nothing short of reckless. The only way to guarantee to the British taxpayer that their money is being spent on food that is healthy, good for the environment and conserves of some of the world's most endangered fish is to introduce legally binding standards for all food purchased with public money."

Members of the public can show their support for the Seafood Procurement Bill signing up as 'fans' of the Bill via the 'Good Food for Our Money campaign' Facebook page.

1. Not all cod, haddock and wild salmon are at risk. However, high proportions of the stocks are, and most are caught in ways that damage marine life - unless explicit effort is made by fish buyers to opt for less damaging 'line caught' options. When asked for data, Defra were unable to provide details of methods of catch or the sustainability credentials of fish bought with public money. With only one certified sustainable option offered to NHS food buyers in the NHS Supply Chain catalogue (see note 4), it is highly unlikely that the fish bought by the public sector is from sustainable sources.

 2. No authoritative figure exists for the amount of seafood bought with taxpayers' money for use in public sector institutions such as schools, hospitals, state-run care homes, prisons, government departments, local authorities and the armed services. We have therefore based our calculations on the following: according to a response by the Minister of Justice to a Freedom of Information request, the department calculates that it spends approximately 2% of its total food budget on seafood, which we understand is broadly representative of government purchasing, according to official government figures for 2008. In fact, more money is likely to be spent on fish in sectors such as schools (where there is a mandatory nutritional requirement for fish to be served regularly), so the 2% figure is a conservative estimate. Nationally, the public sector spends around £2 billion per year on food, according to authoritative figures published by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). So 2% of £2 billion is £40 million. 

3. Good Food for Our Money is a coalition of health, environmental and animal welfare organisations campaigning for mandatory health and sustainability standards for public sector food. The campaign is run by Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming, a registered charity. See the campaign website at: www.sustainweb.org/goodfoodforourmoney. Currently, public sector food does not have to meet any specific health or sustainability standards (except in schools, where mandatory nutrition standards apply).

4. Very little information is collected or made available by government on the sustainability credentials of public sector food (a major problem in its own right, as public sector food buyers cannot easily be held to account for the environmental or ethical impact of their buying). To investigate the seafood choices available to public sector food buyers in their routine purchases, we used figures for the total number of seafood products listed by NHS Supply Chain in its catalogue, which is used mainly by buyers in the healthcare sector (the second largest area of government spending on public sector food, after education). In total, NHS Supply Chain lists 341 'fish', 'seafood' or fish-based 'sandwich filling' products. In the catalogue (viewed February 2010) only one of the fish-based products in their catalogue is listed as certified by the Marine Stewardship Council (see note 5 below).

 5. See the 'fish to avoid' list by the Marine Conservation Society at: www.fishonline.org/advice/avoid . See information about the Marine Stewardship Council sustainability certification scheme at: www.msc.org. Their seafood sustainability certification scheme meets the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation's Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries.

 6. David Drew MP introduced a Parliamentary Bill on 24 February 2010 that would outlaw the purchase of unsustainable fish in the public sector. The Ten minute Rule Motion reads as follows: Mr David Drew: Public Bodies (Procurement of Seafood): That leave be given to bring in a Bill to require public bodies to purchase only those seafood species and stocks that are demonstrably sustainable. See: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmfbusi/a01.htm. Ten minute rule bills do not normally become law but they are a way of MPs drawing attention to an issue.  

7. The Facebook page dedicated to campaigning for Good Food for Our Money is at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Good-Food-for-Our-Money-Campaign/326230074008   

Share this page:

Submit to delicious Submit to digg Submit to facebook Submit to reddit Submit to stumbleupon Tweet this post

Search News

Mike Hancock News Archive

Latest Annual Reports

Each year I publish an Annual Report which is available to any constituent who wants one:

Annual Report 2008 »
Portsmouth Talk 2008 »

Get Adobe Reader

Liberal Democrat News

01 February 2012
The ASA ruled that the image used in an advertisement for L’Oréal Paris’ Revitalift Repair 10 was altered to change Rachel Weisz’s complexion, making it appear smoother and more even. It was judged to be in breach of industry code and “misleadingly exaggerated” the performance of the product.

The advertisement has been banned in its current form and the ASA has warned L’Oréal not to use digital retouching to misrepresent the effect of their products.

Commenting, Jo Swinson said:
“The beauty and advertising industries need to stop ripping off consumers with dishonest images. 

“The banning of this advert, along with the previous ASA rulings banning heavily retouched ads featuring Twiggy, Julia Roberts and Christy Turlington, should act as a wake-up call. Thankfully the advertising regulator has again acknowledged the fraudulent nature of excessive retouching.
 
“The Royal College of Psychiatrists has spoken out about the harmful influence of the media on body image and has highlighted the airbrushing and digital enhancement used to portray physical perfection as an area of concern.
 
“There needs to be much more diversity in advertising – different skin colours, body shapes, sizes and ages.  Studies show that people want to see more authenticity from brands.  Images can be aspirational without being faked.

“The Campaign for Body Confidence challenges the narrow ideal of beauty perpetuated by the media and other industries. Tonight the All Party Parliamentary Group on Body Image is hosting a screening of the documentary Miss Representation which explores the impact on society of such an intense focus on women’s appearance, instead of their achievements. 

“The film shows how media misrepresentation and under representation of women results in a leadership gap and the silencing of difference.”